rajeshalex
06-08 10:25 AM
I would suggest to plan in 3 months advance so that you can send all the documents from usa, prepare documents in India and planning the trip.
If anyone needs a B1 visa frequently asked questions and answers pls send me a PM.
Rajesh
If anyone needs a B1 visa frequently asked questions and answers pls send me a PM.
Rajesh
wallpaper Big Sean – So Much More
Comiccmadd
07-26 05:28 AM
yeah the design is good,but mate, in my opinion we should upload orignal illustrations!
i know this (http://www.computerarts.co.uk/tutorials/2d__and__photoshop/diy_vintage_t-shirts) tutorial from a long time.
yeah u probably didn't coppy it, i'm sure u put some effort on at least coloring it, but still it's absolutely the same pirate!
It's one thing to take an idea and develope it, other is just coppy it!!
I'm posting this because i dont think is very fair for me and the other contestants who put more effort on creating a unique t-shirt.
I'm sure u have a crazy imagination, like most f the designers, and u can come up with something really interestings!
i know this (http://www.computerarts.co.uk/tutorials/2d__and__photoshop/diy_vintage_t-shirts) tutorial from a long time.
yeah u probably didn't coppy it, i'm sure u put some effort on at least coloring it, but still it's absolutely the same pirate!
It's one thing to take an idea and develope it, other is just coppy it!!
I'm posting this because i dont think is very fair for me and the other contestants who put more effort on creating a unique t-shirt.
I'm sure u have a crazy imagination, like most f the designers, and u can come up with something really interestings!
johnick
06-18 04:21 PM
Hi everyone!
I had a question about receiving updates in the mail and checking the case status online. This is for my Marriage-based GC interview at the San Francisco office. My service center is Missouri MSC.
I had my interview for marriage based GC on May 27th. The interview was short and went very well. The IO said that everything was in order, though I needed to have my dr resend USCIS my medical reports again as the dr had missed some fields on the medical form. The IO said many dr's were missing some fields on the recently updated forms. The IO then gave me a form which said that I needed the medical examination resent and which also had the "Further review" box checked. The IO said I should get something in the mail within 10 days of USCIS getting the new medical report.
I immediately went and had my dr resend the medical report with everything filled out. The USCIS acknowledged the receipt of the new fully filled medical form on June 2nd.
It is June 18th today and I have not received anything in the mail yet. The online USCIS case tracker hasn't been updated in months and still shows my case as having been on the "Accepted on March 17th" stage, even though I've already done the finger printing and the interview. Calling the 1-800 number for status updates says the same thing, that I applied on March 17th and that a letter was mailed to me regarding finger printing.
Do you know why I haven't gotten anything in the mail yet, or why the online status tracker hasn't updated at all? I wonder if this is a bad thing, a normal thing, or if the San Francisco field office [or the Missouri Process Center MSC] is taking longer than usual to send out mails after the interviews?
Thanks!
I had a question about receiving updates in the mail and checking the case status online. This is for my Marriage-based GC interview at the San Francisco office. My service center is Missouri MSC.
I had my interview for marriage based GC on May 27th. The interview was short and went very well. The IO said that everything was in order, though I needed to have my dr resend USCIS my medical reports again as the dr had missed some fields on the medical form. The IO said many dr's were missing some fields on the recently updated forms. The IO then gave me a form which said that I needed the medical examination resent and which also had the "Further review" box checked. The IO said I should get something in the mail within 10 days of USCIS getting the new medical report.
I immediately went and had my dr resend the medical report with everything filled out. The USCIS acknowledged the receipt of the new fully filled medical form on June 2nd.
It is June 18th today and I have not received anything in the mail yet. The online USCIS case tracker hasn't been updated in months and still shows my case as having been on the "Accepted on March 17th" stage, even though I've already done the finger printing and the interview. Calling the 1-800 number for status updates says the same thing, that I applied on March 17th and that a letter was mailed to me regarding finger printing.
Do you know why I haven't gotten anything in the mail yet, or why the online status tracker hasn't updated at all? I wonder if this is a bad thing, a normal thing, or if the San Francisco field office [or the Missouri Process Center MSC] is taking longer than usual to send out mails after the interviews?
Thanks!
2011 ig sean so much more cover.
CADude
10-03 12:18 PM
So High school guys(who works in mail room) don't messup with your application again. :)
I need to re-file my I-485 application which was rejected due to USCIS error (they could not find I-140).
Can anybody tell me what is the logic behind writing "DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM" on envelope while re-submitting I-485 appplication?
I will need to send to USCIS today. Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks a lot.
I need to re-file my I-485 application which was rejected due to USCIS error (they could not find I-140).
Can anybody tell me what is the logic behind writing "DO NOT OPEN IN THE MAIL ROOM" on envelope while re-submitting I-485 appplication?
I will need to send to USCIS today. Please let me know ASAP.
Thanks a lot.
more...
permfiling
10-20 10:45 AM
You should take the advice of an attorney. I would recommend Rajiv Khanna. His website is immigration.com. In case india is the only option, you get lactose free stuff as well.
in addition, update your profile.
in addition, update your profile.
rodnyb
03-03 01:12 PM
http://kpkgs.com/files/The_Employment_Based_Green_Card_Process_and_the_Dr amatic_Negative_Impact_of_Country_Based_Quotas_on_ persons_of_Indian_Origin_Feb_20102.pdf
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
Anyone knows the background of this recapture? This is the first time I know congress had a law for it in 2000
Solution
The immediate solution is full accountability of all pending applicants for employment based immigrant visas both at USCIS and DOS. Without accurate data, it is difficult to hold the agencies accountable for their actions or inactions.
Another solution is to �recapture� lost visas. Between 1994 and 2006, USCIS underutilized the visa numbers by approving less than the 140,000 employment based applications each year even though USCIS had more than enough applications pending. Due to the statutory calculation method (explained more fully by USCIS and DOS on their websites), USCIS�s failure to timely process a sufficient number of applications resulted in the loss of approximately 349,000 visa numbers that could not be used in future years since the law prevents usage in future years. In 2000, Congress authorized the use of 130,000 these �lost� visa numbers by what has come to be known as the �visa recapture� method. However, approximately 219,000 numbers have not been �recaptured�. The current worldwide pending cases in all employment based categories is approximately 340,000 applicants. A one‐time recapture of the 219,000 unused visa numbers could go a long way to eliminating this backlog and bringing much needed relief to many applicants who currently face the prospect of becoming residents of the United States after they retire.
more...
REEF�
05-30 03:58 PM
Because the number 28 is f***ing useless.
:love:
:love:
2010 Big Sean – So Much More
Blog Feeds
05-30 08:50 PM
I am not very proud to announce this but, ICE stated a few days ago that the San Diego County Sheriff�s Department is the first law enforcement body to implement the Secure Communities program, under which every individual booked into the three largest jails in San Diego County will have biometric-fingerprints checked in a DHS system for an immigration record.
Secure Communities, which is administered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), streamlines the process by which ICE determines if an individual in the prison system is a removable criminal alien. Under the program, every individual booked into the three largest jails in San Diego County has their biometrics-fingerprints-checked in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) biometric system for any immigration record. Prior to the advent of Secure Communities, as part of the standard booking process, these fingerprints were only checked for criminal history information in the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) biometric system.
If any fingerprints match those of someone in DHS's biometric system, the new automated process notifies ICE and the San Diego intake site submitting the fingerprints. ICE evaluates each case to determine the individual's immigration status and takes appropriate enforcement action after offenders complete their prison terms.
Illegal Immigrants will now be more reluctant to get in touch with law enforcement, thus expect more abuse towards illegals.
Read the ICE press release here.. (http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0905/090526sandiego.htm)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/05/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_s_1.html)
Secure Communities, which is administered by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), streamlines the process by which ICE determines if an individual in the prison system is a removable criminal alien. Under the program, every individual booked into the three largest jails in San Diego County has their biometrics-fingerprints-checked in the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) biometric system for any immigration record. Prior to the advent of Secure Communities, as part of the standard booking process, these fingerprints were only checked for criminal history information in the U.S. Department of Justice's (DOJ) biometric system.
If any fingerprints match those of someone in DHS's biometric system, the new automated process notifies ICE and the San Diego intake site submitting the fingerprints. ICE evaluates each case to determine the individual's immigration status and takes appropriate enforcement action after offenders complete their prison terms.
Illegal Immigrants will now be more reluctant to get in touch with law enforcement, thus expect more abuse towards illegals.
Read the ICE press release here.. (http://www.ice.gov/pi/nr/0905/090526sandiego.htm)
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2009/05/san_diego_immigration_lawyer_s_1.html)
more...
lecter
February 13th, 2005, 05:42 PM
shows you how attitudes to helping sick people have changed. In the old days and in many third world countries, it's still a semi Prison system (to look at)
Rob
Rob
hair Featured: Big Sean “So Much
dish
07-19 11:35 AM
We can send in our recommendations to improve USCIS.
http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0501.shtm
In the current situation USCIS is going to receive around One or Two millions of AOS applications. Issuing EADs and APs are going to face huge delays. So If USCIS cannot keep the 90 day promise for EADs they should issue interim EADs Or Introdue Premium processing for EADs and APs.
http://www.dhs.gov/xabout/structure/editorial_0501.shtm
In the current situation USCIS is going to receive around One or Two millions of AOS applications. Issuing EADs and APs are going to face huge delays. So If USCIS cannot keep the 90 day promise for EADs they should issue interim EADs Or Introdue Premium processing for EADs and APs.
more...
pappu
03-08 04:58 PM
use descriptive titles when you start a thread. threads can be closed by admins. we need to help members easily sift through threads.
hot NEW SONG: Big Sean -quot;So Much
sk.aggarwal
04-10 02:44 PM
I work for a TARP employer and my H1 extension is due on April 30th. I was able to get all the required approvals for the extension last month but immigration firm is not able to file H1 petition as drafted.
They are saying that my orignal H1 was for one legal entity (CORP) and I was working/getting paid by another(BANK NA) (I verified this from orignal H1 petition and W2s). HR and immigration firm are silent on how/why this happened. Now the issue if they do my extension under BANK NA TARP rules will be applied as entities are changing. They are not comfortable doing it for CORP becuase I am not working for it. Just spoke with HR and they are saying that they are looking at the options and what to do next. Not a definate answer will they file and if so under which legal entity?
Can any of the gurus please suggest me what do to? Should I start looking for another job with a consulting company and will even a H1 transfer be possible due to this mess. I am just soo tensed, we are expecting a baby anytime next week and hate this mess.
They are saying that my orignal H1 was for one legal entity (CORP) and I was working/getting paid by another(BANK NA) (I verified this from orignal H1 petition and W2s). HR and immigration firm are silent on how/why this happened. Now the issue if they do my extension under BANK NA TARP rules will be applied as entities are changing. They are not comfortable doing it for CORP becuase I am not working for it. Just spoke with HR and they are saying that they are looking at the options and what to do next. Not a definate answer will they file and if so under which legal entity?
Can any of the gurus please suggest me what do to? Should I start looking for another job with a consulting company and will even a H1 transfer be possible due to this mess. I am just soo tensed, we are expecting a baby anytime next week and hate this mess.
more...
house Big Sean is preparing to drop
grupak
11-16 09:53 AM
On the main page, go to the state chapter link under the main menu and find the NJ contacts... I think chandu23 can help. paskal is the national coordinator who can also help.
tattoo Big Sean – So Much More (Prod.
BharatPremi
12-08 10:23 PM
Great SW33t, Congrats to get over with one more hurdle. And Thanks for sharing the experience.
more...
pictures Big Sean – So Much More (Prod
greenmonster
03-26 02:37 PM
Hello,
I need your advice / opinion on the below scenario...
I and my wife are both employed at the same company, currently on H1.
I am the primary for our GC processing; my wife is dependent on me with regards to GC.
We both got our EAD and AP. 140 approved in May 2007, 485 Filed in Aug 2007.
I have submitted I-9 to the company in order to be on EAD status.
I am planning to have my Wife resign from the current employer and work for a diff company/vendor by using EAD.
Questions: 1.Does the above scenario bring up any issues with regards to our work status or any other issues with the current employer or to the GC process?
2. Can I work on a part time project?
Please advice
I need your advice / opinion on the below scenario...
I and my wife are both employed at the same company, currently on H1.
I am the primary for our GC processing; my wife is dependent on me with regards to GC.
We both got our EAD and AP. 140 approved in May 2007, 485 Filed in Aug 2007.
I have submitted I-9 to the company in order to be on EAD status.
I am planning to have my Wife resign from the current employer and work for a diff company/vendor by using EAD.
Questions: 1.Does the above scenario bring up any issues with regards to our work status or any other issues with the current employer or to the GC process?
2. Can I work on a part time project?
Please advice
dresses Big Sean - So Much More - Song
sonu9
07-31 12:32 AM
reply please
more...
makeup New one from Big Sean,
senk1s
09-12 09:10 PM
LUD = somebody 'looked' at your case for something ...
On the positive side it means that the app is not lost
On the positive side it means that the app is not lost
girlfriend Big Sean - quot;So Much Morequot;
gimme_GC2006
07-18 06:34 AM
Sorry I can not answer your question. But I have one question for you see if you can help me.
You said that by AUG 2008 bulletin, your dates are current.. Which date we should refer to? Date from I-140 or date from I-485?
Can u pls help?
Thanks
That would be your PD date which will be on your I-140
You said that by AUG 2008 bulletin, your dates are current.. Which date we should refer to? Date from I-140 or date from I-485?
Can u pls help?
Thanks
That would be your PD date which will be on your I-140
hairstyles ig sean so much more.
glus
02-23 01:54 PM
If the position you are being sponsored is 50% or more different than the position under which you have gained your experience, then experience gained in the same company can be counted. Your attorney somehow has to show that the postion you have now is more than 50% different (duties etc) than the new one. This is a tricky one and you would need a GOOOOOOD attorney to do that.
G
G
boldm28
06-17 06:52 PM
Hi ,
I have a approved I 140 and had filed for my 1485 back in 2005 and till now have been working on h1 and regularly extending my EAD , and AP , now the firm( firm A) which actually filed my 485 petition has split ( A and B)and my case papers are with attorney A
now come july 2007 , i file my wife's 485 that is filed by attorney B , now the situation is such i dont know who has my papers . I do have copies of filed 485 and approved I140 . I want to inform USCIS that all the correspondence not to be sent to Either A or B but to be sent directly to me , so How do i go about doing that , the only reason I ask this is so that i have more control over my case cause the above attorneys were picked by my company and not very forthcoming when talking to me , even though I am the one who paid for all the services
PLEASE .. PLEASE Help me
I have a approved I 140 and had filed for my 1485 back in 2005 and till now have been working on h1 and regularly extending my EAD , and AP , now the firm( firm A) which actually filed my 485 petition has split ( A and B)and my case papers are with attorney A
now come july 2007 , i file my wife's 485 that is filed by attorney B , now the situation is such i dont know who has my papers . I do have copies of filed 485 and approved I140 . I want to inform USCIS that all the correspondence not to be sent to Either A or B but to be sent directly to me , so How do i go about doing that , the only reason I ask this is so that i have more control over my case cause the above attorneys were picked by my company and not very forthcoming when talking to me , even though I am the one who paid for all the services
PLEASE .. PLEASE Help me
marlon2006
06-21 09:39 AM
Hearings will go on for a while. Since it is already known that the public oppose amnesty, personally I will definitely forget CIR. It may return again next year, but remember that by then the Senate may have voted out a number of incumbents that voted pro CIR.
I think this will take patience. If one can wait and watch this unfold for the next 2-5 years without going crazy, then you may watch the passage of CIR during your lifetime.
out of deference to the President, the republicans are not coming out publicly in opposition to it, but in private they are acknowledging anonymously that the bill is dead
I think this will take patience. If one can wait and watch this unfold for the next 2-5 years without going crazy, then you may watch the passage of CIR during your lifetime.
out of deference to the President, the republicans are not coming out publicly in opposition to it, but in private they are acknowledging anonymously that the bill is dead
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар