jjaspirant
03-18 10:51 PM
My PD is Feb 2007, EB3 category.
My I-140 is approved and I485 was filed in July 2007 (pending more than 180 days)
I have an EAD.
My employer revokes the I-140 for people they lay off. Does the RFE come immediately when they revoke the I-140 or does it come at the time of adjudication - which in my case is a long time away since my PD is Feb 2007 in EB3 category.
My I-140 is approved and I485 was filed in July 2007 (pending more than 180 days)
I have an EAD.
My employer revokes the I-140 for people they lay off. Does the RFE come immediately when they revoke the I-140 or does it come at the time of adjudication - which in my case is a long time away since my PD is Feb 2007 in EB3 category.
wallpaper Casey Anthony Trial, Caylee
alterego
02-06 08:13 AM
It looks as though they have updated their page. Previously they were suggesting people apply 180 days in advance.
jliechty
March 5th, 2005, 09:39 PM
I'll throw in my very non-expert opinion here, having shot just a few weddings basically in your position.
The dress in the first shot is blown out. I might have angled the vertical dimension a bit lower to capture the full length portraits and avoid so much "dead space" at the top.
The composition on the second one is ok, but the eyes are rolling all over the room (bad grammar intentional). Since I've never shot in a paid position where I had the authority to exclude other photography during the group shots (not that I would even then), I generally defer first to the "guest" photographers, telling everyone to take their turn one at a time, and to speak up before the photo to get the subjects looking at them. Then I take over the attention and get everyone to look at me for however many shots I need to take of that pose. BTW, it's always good to take a few shots of each pose, because you're almost guaranteed to have closed eyes in different shots. I'm sure the pros will be in shortly to fill us both in on a better way to do this (I'd appreciate that, too). :)
The fill flash was done excellently, but the background is very contrasty and thus distracting.
This is just MHO, and probably doesn't amount to much. Also, please don't feel bad - I've made most of these mistakes myself (and managed to pull off some others that you didn't think of). :o ;)
The dress in the first shot is blown out. I might have angled the vertical dimension a bit lower to capture the full length portraits and avoid so much "dead space" at the top.
The composition on the second one is ok, but the eyes are rolling all over the room (bad grammar intentional). Since I've never shot in a paid position where I had the authority to exclude other photography during the group shots (not that I would even then), I generally defer first to the "guest" photographers, telling everyone to take their turn one at a time, and to speak up before the photo to get the subjects looking at them. Then I take over the attention and get everyone to look at me for however many shots I need to take of that pose. BTW, it's always good to take a few shots of each pose, because you're almost guaranteed to have closed eyes in different shots. I'm sure the pros will be in shortly to fill us both in on a better way to do this (I'd appreciate that, too). :)
The fill flash was done excellently, but the background is very contrasty and thus distracting.
This is just MHO, and probably doesn't amount to much. Also, please don't feel bad - I've made most of these mistakes myself (and managed to pull off some others that you didn't think of). :o ;)
2011 Bella Vita
logiclife
06-04 01:12 PM
There are still some new members who keep posting that the bill S 1348 looks very good and it has SKIL provisions etc, because they get pointed to the last year's bill.
If you go on thomas.loc.gov and find bill text for S. 1348 you see a bill that is a copy-paste version of LAST YEAR'S SENATE BILL S. 2611.
That text is last years text that was initially put in place as a place-holder BEFORE the grand compromise was reached.
After the grand bargin (compromise/coalition) was reached, the text of the grand compromise replaced the entire text of last year's bill (that has SKIL) was the next text.
Amendment # 1150 (S.A. 1150) Sponsored by Sen. Kennedy is a 400 page amendment that replaces the entire text that was intially in the bill with the new text. Its a "Substitute" amendment.
Read the S. A. 1150 text. Its also on IV homepage as PDF. That is the bill now. Here is the link to that
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
If you go on thomas.loc.gov and find bill text for S. 1348 you see a bill that is a copy-paste version of LAST YEAR'S SENATE BILL S. 2611.
That text is last years text that was initially put in place as a place-holder BEFORE the grand compromise was reached.
After the grand bargin (compromise/coalition) was reached, the text of the grand compromise replaced the entire text of last year's bill (that has SKIL) was the next text.
Amendment # 1150 (S.A. 1150) Sponsored by Sen. Kennedy is a 400 page amendment that replaces the entire text that was intially in the bill with the new text. Its a "Substitute" amendment.
Read the S. A. 1150 text. Its also on IV homepage as PDF. That is the bill now. Here is the link to that
http://immigrationvoice.org/media/forums/Immigration_Bill_Substitute.pdf
more...
Blog Feeds
06-09 02:10 PM
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi79QfJkMroREgt5bNuQmsJGKENDy1haq6VMBmYoDFNbauU2v64EszdL3mAsjoxF88M-G54eBRT76zq71MDkHNEnRUNVqXNLM5se8s06a0bQorZLsuTHzbVubXocebsiW0bFcwkZKvMid19/s200/gay+wedding.jpg (https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi79QfJkMroREgt5bNuQmsJGKENDy1haq6VMBmYoDFNbauU2v64EszdL3mAsjoxF88M-G54eBRT76zq71MDkHNEnRUNVqXNLM5se8s06a0bQorZLsuTHzbVubXocebsiW0bFcwkZKvMid19/s1600-h/gay+wedding.jpg)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
Sen. Patrick Leahy ( D-Vermont ) introduced the Uniting American Families Act ( S. 424 ) earlier this year; it has 18 co-sponsors. The bill would allow same sex couples the same immigration rights as married heterosexual couples. Passage of the bill is likely to be tied to overall immigration reform.
At the moment, same-sex partners of legal immigrants do not have the same rights to dependent status that heterosexual spouses get. This is true even if the couple is legally married in their home country. Often, the "dependent" partner must apply for a B-2 visitor visa at the consulate, to accompany his/her partner. This visa is discretionary, and consulates could refuse to issue it. In addition, B-2 status does not allow the dependent partner to work in the US. Many heterosexual dependent spouses have a status that doesn't allow them to work either, however.
As the New York Times (http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/03/us/politics/03immig.html) reports:
Senator Leahy�s bill would add the term �permanent partner� to sections of current immigration law that refer to married couples, and would provide a legal definition of those terms.
�I just think it�s a matter of fairness,� he said Tuesday in an interview, noting that a number of American allies, including Canada, France and Germany, recognize same-sex couples in immigration law. Photo by http://www.flickr.com/photos/boscobridalexpos/
http://immigrationvoice.org//blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/2893395975825897727-1281256503142232618?l=martinvisalaw.blogspot.com
More... (http://martinvisalaw.blogspot.com/2009/06/immigration-rights-for-gay-couples.html)
sdrblr
10-15 10:12 AM
I dont think this is going to affect non immigrant community (read as H1s, GC etc). This is all about politics to gain the support of rich and influential Indian American community for the DNC and upcoming elections.
more...
jimytomy
04-27 05:39 PM
Friends,
My EB2 I-140 got approved during 1st week of April and USCIS successfully ported my EB3 priority date of Jan, 2006 to the new EB2 I-140. As per my attorney, interfiling shouldn't be done as I have been with same employer all along and same employer sponsored for my porting. The attorney says, this should be automatically taken care of by USCIS.
My question is...I couldn't find the proper procedure/documentation for my scenario. Did any body come across this situation and can any one offer any suggestion?
Thanks for any inputs,
My Lawyer did send a interfiling letter with EB2 I -140 application. You can send it even after I-140 approval . Lawyer can send Interfiling letter requesting to approve I-1485 and also attach the copy of I485 Receipt notices ( you and your family).
Best Luck
----------------------
Please note , I am not a Lawyer. Contact Lawyer for proper guidance.
My EB2 I-140 got approved during 1st week of April and USCIS successfully ported my EB3 priority date of Jan, 2006 to the new EB2 I-140. As per my attorney, interfiling shouldn't be done as I have been with same employer all along and same employer sponsored for my porting. The attorney says, this should be automatically taken care of by USCIS.
My question is...I couldn't find the proper procedure/documentation for my scenario. Did any body come across this situation and can any one offer any suggestion?
Thanks for any inputs,
My Lawyer did send a interfiling letter with EB2 I -140 application. You can send it even after I-140 approval . Lawyer can send Interfiling letter requesting to approve I-1485 and also attach the copy of I485 Receipt notices ( you and your family).
Best Luck
----------------------
Please note , I am not a Lawyer. Contact Lawyer for proper guidance.
2010 I think Casey Anthony is a
masala dosa
07-17 05:14 PM
Just checking the website after a long time.
WHere is IV core grp?
In the meantime everyone knows the latest on Aug bulletin.
to add some humor i am adding a link....
the video unfortunately in in Tamil....
if only there were folks outside the processing centers as shown in the video
:D :D :D :D :D :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbmoOcg5vVM&search=senthil
WHere is IV core grp?
In the meantime everyone knows the latest on Aug bulletin.
to add some humor i am adding a link....
the video unfortunately in in Tamil....
if only there were folks outside the processing centers as shown in the video
:D :D :D :D :D :D
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mbmoOcg5vVM&search=senthil
more...
idark
06-29 02:19 PM
Nice concept :) Very innovative!
hair Casey Anthony Trial, Caylee
Blog Feeds
09-17 06:00 PM
As a service to our readers we publish local ceremony dates. If USCIS approves your application for naturalization, you must attend a ceremony and take the Oath of Allegiance to the United States. USCIS will notify you by mail of the time and date of your ceremony.
The notice USCIS sends you is called the "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445). In some cases, USCIS may give you the option to take the Oath on the same day as your interview. If you decide to take a "same day" oath, USCIS will ask you to come back to the office later that day. At this time, you will take the Oath and receive your Certificate of Naturalization.
If you cannot go to the oath ceremony, you should return the "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445) that USCIS sent to you. You should send the N-445 back to your local office. Include a letter saying why you cannot go to the ceremony. Make a copy of the notice and your letter before you send them to USCIS. Your local office will reschedule you and send you a new "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445) to tell you when your ceremony will be.
SAN DIEGO NATURALIZATION CEREMONIES
2010/2011
SEPTEMBER 17, 2010
OCTOBER 20, 2010
NOVEMBER 17, 2010
DECEMBER 16, 2010
JANUARY 9, 2011
FEBRUARY 23, 2011
MARCH 23, 2011
APRIL 27, 2011
MAY 18, 2011
JUNE 22, 2011
JULY 20, 2011
AUGUST 24, 2011
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011
SEPTEMBER 28, 2011
OCTOBER 19, 2011
NOVEMBER 16, 2011
DECEMBER 14, 2011
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/09/san_diego_citizenship_attorney_1.html)
The notice USCIS sends you is called the "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445). In some cases, USCIS may give you the option to take the Oath on the same day as your interview. If you decide to take a "same day" oath, USCIS will ask you to come back to the office later that day. At this time, you will take the Oath and receive your Certificate of Naturalization.
If you cannot go to the oath ceremony, you should return the "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445) that USCIS sent to you. You should send the N-445 back to your local office. Include a letter saying why you cannot go to the ceremony. Make a copy of the notice and your letter before you send them to USCIS. Your local office will reschedule you and send you a new "Notice of Naturalization Oath Ceremony" (Form N-445) to tell you when your ceremony will be.
SAN DIEGO NATURALIZATION CEREMONIES
2010/2011
SEPTEMBER 17, 2010
OCTOBER 20, 2010
NOVEMBER 17, 2010
DECEMBER 16, 2010
JANUARY 9, 2011
FEBRUARY 23, 2011
MARCH 23, 2011
APRIL 27, 2011
MAY 18, 2011
JUNE 22, 2011
JULY 20, 2011
AUGUST 24, 2011
SEPTEMBER 16, 2011
SEPTEMBER 28, 2011
OCTOBER 19, 2011
NOVEMBER 16, 2011
DECEMBER 14, 2011
More... (http://www.visalawyerblog.com/2010/09/san_diego_citizenship_attorney_1.html)
more...
prom2
07-26 01:48 PM
Let's start a thread with Jun-Jul-Aug I-485 receipts information.
Please share your experiences with receipts.
If you call USCIS asking for receipts, please post the info you got.
If your checks were cashed, please post it.
If you have any update, please share it.
Please share your experiences with receipts.
If you call USCIS asking for receipts, please post the info you got.
If your checks were cashed, please post it.
If you have any update, please share it.
hot Casey Anthony murder trial:
kirupa
06-22 03:11 AM
wiifanatic - the image has to be at least 800x600 in dimensions :)
more...
house Bella Vita middot; Casey
thomachan72
11-01 02:29 PM
A chart from Reason Magazine that says it all:
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/10/immigration-humor-what-part-of-legal-immigration-dont-you-understand.html)
Pretty depressing but very true indeed:o:o:o
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/gregsiskind/2010/10/immigration-humor-what-part-of-legal-immigration-dont-you-understand.html)
Pretty depressing but very true indeed:o:o:o
tattoo Casey Anthony
adibhatla
04-29 12:37 PM
I traveled (together with my family) through this route last year with the same circumstances you are in. There will be no problem and they won't ask you for any documents. If your flight on return is from Dubai to any US city, they will see your AP, Passport. If you have a valid AP at that time then they will allow you back.
Cheers!
MA
Cheers!
MA
more...
pictures Casey Anthony#39;s #39;Bella Vita#39;
rbharol
09-08 03:01 PM
:)
You actually stayed awake to listen /Watch to this!!!!.. hey comeon.. don't let the immigration dream take away your sleep...enjoy while you can..life goes on..
I am in California so it was 9:40 for me....
I do not sleep before 10 anyway.
You actually stayed awake to listen /Watch to this!!!!.. hey comeon.. don't let the immigration dream take away your sleep...enjoy while you can..life goes on..
I am in California so it was 9:40 for me....
I do not sleep before 10 anyway.
dresses Bella Vita Tattoo - Casey
vhcl
June 8th, 2005, 07:45 AM
Whao!!!
I'm a newbi, and I have allways been fascinated by this effect, can you share any pointers!
Thanks
I'm a newbi, and I have allways been fascinated by this effect, can you share any pointers!
Thanks
more...
makeup The tattoo:
desixp
05-28 08:46 PM
Hi RayofLight,
Thanks for your effort. Will meet you at DC.
DesiXP
Thanks for your effort. Will meet you at DC.
DesiXP
girlfriend Bella Vita: Roberto Benigni
MONCYS
03-25 11:14 PM
TSC is down and they are using a new system named "CHIMP" to enhance the operations.
hairstyles Casey Anthony trial: #39;Bella Vita#39; tattoo was inked during Caylee#39;s
chanduv23
11-01 08:01 AM
if u file for 140, chances are that it will get approved before may 2007 is high. If u have an approved 140, you can get 3 year extension. If you seek extension based on labor, you will get 1 year extension. I recommend u to apply for 140 (if possible premium) ASAP. Even otherwise,you are fine to get an year of extension.
ramaonline
10-09 01:15 AM
You must have I94 showing H1B classification and validity dates to change status to H1. You can travel and re-enter with a H1 visa stamp and obtain h1 status. Please check with the company attorney,
saxx
01-19 08:34 PM
That is beautiful sir.
Няма коментари:
Публикуване на коментар